CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION ROOM NO. 329, SECOND FLOOR, C-WING August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 F.No.CIC/SA/A/2013/000062-YA Date of Hearing : 18.02.2015 Date of Decision : 24.02.2015 Appellant : Shri R.K. Jain New Delhi Respondent : Dept. of Revenue, M/o Finance
New Delhi Information Commissioner : Shri Yashovardhan Azad Relevant facts emerging from complaints:
RTI application filed on : 26.08.2013 PIO replied on : 27.09.2013 First Appeal filed on : 07.10.2013 First Appellate Authority (FAA) order on : 06.11.2013 Second Appeal received on : 18.11.2013 Interim Decision
The respondent is not present, despite written notices sent. The appellant vide his RTI application dated 26.08.2013 sought inspection of file from which the exemption notification nos. 25/2012 ST, 14/2011 ST and 2/94-St was issued/amended. CPIO/Tech. Officer (TRU) in his reply allowed inspection of files consisting of notifications, not forming part of budgetary process, but denied the same for files consisting notifications forming part of budgetary process. The FAA in his order upheld the decision of the CPIO.
Similar case was adjudicated vide order dt. 30.01.2015 in F.No. CIC/SA/A/2013/000055-YA,