Proceedings Before the Commission:
5. Both the parties heard and made submission. Appellant submitted that he wanted the attendance sheet of certain staff of labour court, which CPIO denied by claiming it third party information. He had also filed first appeal, but till date no order has been passed by FAA in this regard.
6. The PIO, on the other hand submitted that the appellant is a dismissed employee. He is seeking attendance sheet of other employee which is a third party information and he is not ready to explain the public interest/purpose involved in seeking the attendance sheet of employee. It appears that he has some personal vengeance. The respondent officer also stated that there is personal dispute between appellant and his wife, so he wanted to know the attendance details of his wife. The office of District Session Court do not maintain attendance sheet beyond one year, hence they cannot provide the same.