had not furnished the information even after the submission of requisite fee by him. Respondent officer, on the other hand state that they had called the appellant for taking the information but he choose not to appear, even otherwise they had sent a copy of the documents to him via speed post.
7. Having heard the submission and perused the record, the Commission directs the respondent authority to facilitate inspection of the records again and provide the documents which are shown the appellant. In view of the same, the present second appeal is disposed of.
(M. Sridhar Acharyulu) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (Babu Lal) Deputy Registrar.