:
1. Appellant through his RTI application sought information with respect to his complaint dt 20.5.2014, action taken on it, officer dealing with it, file noting etc. PIO in his reply enclosed the information, which appellant claim to be not enclosed. Being unsatisfied with PIO reply, the appellant made First Appeal. Claiming non furnishing of information from the respondent authority, appellant approached the Commission through this present second appeal.
Proceedings Before the Commission:
2. Both the parties made their submissions. The appellant submitted that he had not received the enclosure referred to have been enclosed by the respondent authority. The respondent CIC/SA/A/2014/001514 Page 1 authority submitted that the enclosure was enclosed along with the forwarding letter. As the appellant is claiming that he had not received, the respondent officer furnished a copy of the enclosure to the appellant during hearing, which the appellant has acknowledged. In view of this, the Commission closes the appeal.