:
Proceedings Before the Commission:
2. Both the parties made their submissions. The appellant submitted that the he did not get the information about the marriage certificate of one Mr. Jagjit Singh and he is interested in the same because he was the witness to that marriage and he needs the copy of the document as the said Mr. Jagjit Singh was reported to be fraud. The respondent authority claimed that the relevant file is not traceable as the jurisdiction of the SDM was changed since September, 2012. The respondent officer also submitted that the information sought by the appellant is 'third party' information. The appellant alleged that the respondent authority is hiding the file as the record cannot be misplaced in spite of change of jurisdiction and the ADM for both the SDM(Khanjawala) and SDM(Rohini) is same.