:
2. Complainant through his RTI application had sought for information on following points :
3. PIO in his reply dated 01.12.2014 referred to Hon'ble Madras High Court decision in W.P (C) No. 26781 of 2013 and CIC decision in case of Smt Uma Kanti Vs. Navodya Vidhyalaya in response to the Complainants RTI application.
4. Being unsatisfied with the reply of PIO, appellant preferred First Appeal on 08.12.2014.
5. Claiming that the PIO has deliberately, malafidely and persistently not provided the information as per the RTI application, the Complainant has approached the Commission in Complaint Under Section 18 of the RTI Act.