Deepak Kr Singh.
Information sought:
1. Appellant through his RTI application had sought for inspection of the admission register and medical case sheets of patients of Sushruta Trauma Centre from the year 2002 to 2006.
PIO response:
2. PIO denied the information under Sec 8 (1)(j) of the RTI Act. Ground for First Appeal:
3. Unsatisfied with the information furnished by PIO. First Appellate Authority Order:
4. FAA upheld the information furnished by PIO. Ground For Second Appeal :
5. That the PIO be directed to furnish complete and correct information. Proceedings Before the Commission:
6. The respondent authority submitted that the appellant has filed more than 100 RTI applications with them on more or less similar points and that they have furnished the information as per their record. The Commission observes that this is misuse of RTI for private vengeance. The Commission also finds no public interest in the points raised by the appellant.