Quantcast
Channel: Central Information Commission
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20258

Drraghvendra Singh vs Gnctd on 18 May, 2015

$
0
0

:

CIC/SA/C/2015/000062

2.  Complainant   through   his   RTI   application   sought   to   know   when   the   education  department had received the suspension files from the school, when was the file received  CIC/SA/C/2015/000062 & CIC/SA/A/2015/000012, 13, 14, 15, 16  Page 2 by the education department, when was the file sent to DDE­West - A. Claiming non­ furnishing of information, complainant approached Commission. CIC/SA/A/2015/000012

3. Complainant through his RTI application wanted to know the rules under DSER 1973  wherein in the absence of HOS, three people were appointed, agenda of the meeting dated  23.4.2013.  PIO for point no.1 asked the appellant to refer to DSER 1973 and point no. 2  provided the detail.  Being unsatisfied, appellant filed first appeal. Claiming non­furnishing  of information, appellant approached the Commission. CIC/SA/A/2015/000013


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20258

Trending Articles