:
2. Appellant sought to know action taken on his application dt 18.6.2014, time period for taking action ,reason for not taking action within prescribed time, to whom the complaint is to be made against nondisposal of complaint. CPIO replied that it is under progress. Unsatisfied with the PIO reply, appellant made first appeal. No order passed by first appellate authority. Claiming nonfurnishing of information by the respondent authority, the appellant approached the Commission.
3. The appellant is not present. The Public Authority made their submissions. The respondent officer submitted that the appellant had applied for financial assistance under 'Widow daughter's marriage' for rs.30,000/ has been processed, sanctioned and paid to the appellant. In view of this as the appellant's grievance has been redressed, the Commission closes the appeal.