:
2. Appellant sought for action taken report on his letter dt 6.2.2014, certified copy of official noting, reply received from DAVPS, details of complaints, name of complainant, date of complaint and action taken on complaints since October 2013. PIO enclosed the information on point no 1,2,3 & 5. Unsatisfied with the PIO reply, appellant made first appeal. FAA directed the PIO to provide information within 7 days. On non compliance of FAA order, appellant approached the Commission.
3. The appellant is not present. The Public Authority made their submissions. The respondent officer submitted that the appellant has been furnished with the relevant information. The appellant is fighting against the DAV Public School, which is one of the best schools in Delhi, on the ground of encroachment of DDA land. The respondent authority have already made correspondence with the DDA, which has asked the Department to indicate the alternative arrangements made to the students of the school who will be disturbed due to demolition of the school encroachment. The department had replied to the DDA that they can give admission to the disturbed students in the Government school near to the DAV Public School. In the meanwhile, the DAV Public School had gone to the High Court and obtained the stay order against the demolition move. The appellant has also lodged a complaint against the DDE, Ms. Saroj Bala, seeking her prosecution, and the same was disposed of by the Court.