1. The present proceedings have erupted due to noncompliance of the Commission's order dated 8.3.11 in CIC/SS/A/2010/000929. The applicant Sh. Mukesh Kumar has approached this Commission vide letter dated 9.5.11 being dissatisfied with the FAA's order passed in pursuance to Commission's earlier order.
Applicant was present and heard. Respondent is represented by Sh. Bal Krishna, ACP accompanied by Sh. Ashok Kumar, SHO.
2. The factual matrix of this case is that while deciding an earlier appeal of the appellant, CIC [CIC/SS/A/2010/000929] has directed the FAA to "pass a speaking order within 3 weeks of receipt of the order of the Commission."
3. It was seen that applicant has sent an RTI request dated Nil seeking "information about the complaints filed by Sh. Sanjeev Kumar and the action taken."
4. It was noted by the Commission in the earlier order that PIO has enclosed SHO's report without enclosing the complaint petition. When the First Appeal was made, FAA vide its