Quantcast
Channel: Central Information Commission
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20258

Mr.Dinesh Kumar Patra vs Indian Drugs Andpharmceutical ... on 16 December, 2013

$
0
0

1. Sh. Dinesh Kumar Patra (hereinafter referred to as appellant) has filed this appeal dated  25.3.13   against   the   respondent   IDPL.   During   the   hearing,   appellant   was   present   and  heard. Respondent is represented by Ms. Amita Bhatia and Sh. Tarakantha Pradhan.

2. The appellant has made an  RTI request on 8.8.08  seeking information on increments  granted to Sh. NKP Sinha. In this RTI, he has sought information about the action taken  and recovery of the amount from the said person. Information about benefits enjoyed by  Sh. NKP Sinha and the steps to recover the amount was also sought.

3. CPIO   made   a   point­wise   reply   vide   his   letter   dated  5/9/08.  It   was   informed   that   two  increments have been drawn. It was further informed that the said person is not drawing  special pay and therefore, question of recovery of any amount is not needed.

4. Being dissatisfied with the CPIO's reply, he made the First Ap


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 20258

Trending Articles