:
1. Appellant through his RTI application sought information with respect . PIO on. Being unsatisfied with PIO reply, the appellant made First Appeal. First Appellate Authority upheld the PIO reply. Unsatisfied with FAA order, appellant approach the Commission through this present second appeal.
Proceedings Before the Commission:
2. The appellant is not present. The Public Authority made their submissions. They submitted that the appellant has been offered inspection but never turned up. They also submitted that the appellant files a number of RTI applications but does not show CIC/SA/A/2014/001583 Page 1 any interest thereafter for the information. The Commission observes that this is yet another case of misuse of RTI and the appellant habitually files the RTI applications and does not seem to be interested for the information sought thereby wasting the time of the Public Authority. Hence the appeal is dismissed.